Interesting announcement from Dundas. Massive sulphide is better when it isn’t pyrite, fools gold. But the XRF readings are interesting, and where there is pyrite, there can be other mineralization nearby. Good enough with greenfield to get on #watchlist. $dun $dun.ax
@jtourzan Appears to be oxide - if it’s nickel sulphide in the oxidation zone then it’s poss/prob untreatable bec the nickel sulphide alters to violarite when exposed to the air and can spontaneously combust/ catch fire - hence nickel miners ignore the oxide zone
@Eagleresa Crazy stock up another 70% this morning. $dun.ax
@jtourzan Never let the fundamentals get in the way of a good story
@jtourzan Anyone remember CBE : highlights the problem of relying on assays with a “gun” targeting the pin-head on something metallic / sulphide looking amongst the gravel or in drillcore - bit different to assaying over 1m or more.
@jtourzan So with $DUN the excitement appears to be based on the bits of sulphide- being pyrite (ie worthless) having replaced other sulphide - massive should mean ALL the gravel shown is sulphide and ideally the right colour or colours for nickel etc as shown in the examples from Nova.
@Eagleresa @jtourzan Doesn't 500,000 ppm sulfur on XRF tell you it is indeed massive sulfide?
@witchdoc86 @jtourzan Prob is xrf is just a gun - so measurement can be just a pinhead in a rock chip - person taking it obv going to test best looking