Mission:data @mission_data

Non-profit promoting standards-based energy data portability. Innovation in software, renewables and energy efficiency! missiondata.io Joined January 2014

Tweets

5K
Followers

1K
Following

595
Likes

4K

Mission:data @mission_data

9 hours ago

@ts_fisher @pmarca There would be only landlines, no cell phones at all! archive.org/details/dealof…

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

Here's the Pennsylvania PUC's draft rule that would put the fox in charge of the henhouse "Rather than the Commission refereeing distributed resources, let's have a conflicted entity do it. What could go wrong?"

1 1 1 64 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

13 hours ago

Throwback: In 1999, the Pennsylvania PUC was struggling with "Electronic Data Interchange" (EDI) to enable retail electric choice. This is back during the "crypto wars" where the federal government tried to criminalize Pretty Good Privacy (PGP, now ubiquitous public-key crypto).

0 0 0 34 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

4 days ago

@DavidPomerantz <cough> Connecticut PURA

0 0 2 60 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

5 days ago

@MikeBull_MN Better technology helps. Too often regulators endorse Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), which is outdated and insecure. The Illinois example occurred because regulators were asleep at the wheel. Modern data portability is more secure. x.com/mission_data/s…

Mission:data @mission_data

a year ago

🧵 There's a lot to be said about this. But a critical fact is missing from these media reports: Utilities' retail supply web portals (like Ameren Illinois's) have a feature (or bug) that made this "scraping" possible. Let's have a look. utilitydive.com/news/voltus-fe…

1 1 6 1K 1

0 0 3 159 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

5 days ago

Utilities: Green Button Connect represents an intolerable risk to privacy and cybersecurity. It's automated and that's scary! Also utilities: The only sources of known privacy violations are human errors when we screw up on emails. Time to ban email!

0 0 1 45 0

View Details

Jeff St. John @jeffsaintjohn

5 days ago

Third-party demand response provider @voltusinc and @mission_data say utility barriers to accessing smart meter data are blocking gigawatts of grid relief in PJM, the biggest U.S. energy market — and they're asking regulators to step in: canarymedia.com/articles/utili…

0 1 8 998 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

a week ago

"Access to real-time electricity data should be a basic consumer right." utilitydive.com/news/access-to…

0 1 1 38 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

a week ago

Why does @EIAgov still collect this in 861 files? "Daily digital access" is so 2010. Many utilities don't even bother to respond. It should be updated to ask not whether customers can see their own info (they should!) but whether access can be electronically delegated.

0 0 3 56 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

2 weeks ago

Periodic reminder that all Pennsylvania utilities have staunchly opposed data access. Here is a helpful summary from the PaPUC when CPower sought a license. The utilities responded with a resounding "no."

0 1 1 44 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

2 weeks ago

Alex, I'll take egregious billing system errors for 800. One way to discourage distributed solar is for the utility to play Kafkaesque games with your bills for 18 months

0 0 1 77 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

3 weeks ago

One of California's interesting attempts to get rate IDs more seamlessly to appliances like water heaters. The QR codes are supposed to identify your correct rate plan, which can be more easily shared with devices.

0 0 1 58 1

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

4 weeks ago

Rhode Island PUC hearing now on Green Button Connect: video.ibm.com/channel/WqQyXw…

0 0 0 36 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

4 weeks ago

@TKavulla @ComEd Old thread, but....Travis, do you have an ICC docket # for the decision requiring utilities to settle wholesale load to customer demand as measured by AMI?

0 0 0 19 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

4 weeks ago

SoCal Edison, when asking for $3.5 billion for AMI v2.0: Cybersecurity is no problem! No worries! SCE when third parties ask for customer data: AMI v2.0 presents grave cybersecurity risks! 🤷‍♂️

0 0 5 158 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

4 weeks ago

@mattyglesias Only 11% of Americans are on dynamic pricing, despite 15+ years of advanced meters. State regulators are very hesitant.

1 0 2 69 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

a month ago

From 2025 report. More falsehoods from LG&E-KU.

0 0 0 39 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

a month ago

LG&E continues to lie about its Green Button Connect in its annual AMI report. LG&E admitted to us that it DOES NOT have GBC, but it's happy to tell the KY PSC otherwise.

1 0 0 148 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

a month ago

Any sufficiently advanced utility incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. h/t Matt Roderick

0 0 0 54 0

View Details

Mission:data @mission_data

a month ago

@StephenJ_Caruso It would be even better if the PaPUC *followed state law* and used the $2.2 billion already spent on smart meters to enable demand response. x.com/mission_data/s…

Mission:data @mission_data

2 months ago

Here is the PaPUC back in 2015 siding with utilities and memorializing an illegal arrangement (contrary to Act 129) that is a de facto ban on competitive residential demand response. The Governor has done nothing to remedy this, despite appointing 2 Cmrs and the chair!