NEWS: Twitter might work on letting users see a detailed view of how the algorithm “weighs” their account. If badly weighed by the algo, (ie toxicity score is high) users would have transparency into the score and ability to get into good standing.
@titterdaily Avoiding dystopian outcomes is not easy. The intent is not for the algorithm to be some judgy moral arbiter, but rather that it do its best to inform & entertain. Trying to maximize unregretted user-minutes seems like the right objective.
@elonmusk @titterdaily Twitter can’t even understand simple English idioms. AI is not ready for prime time.
@elonmusk @titterdaily The problem is, it will eventually, and probably quickly, be weaponized. Governments won't be able to resist the urge to meddle with it. It's what they do.
@elonmusk @titterdaily Every tweet I see of yours and the Nazis you enable is regretted minutes
@elonmusk @titterdaily That will require judgments, including moral ones. You can't escape that any more than you can the chromosomes in your cells. Be glad this is so because in either case doing so would be relinquishing your humanity itself.
@elonmusk @titterdaily Elon...................This has to stop 👇
@elonmusk @titterdaily LIKE A FUNNEL FOR YOUR PREFERENCES.
@elonmusk @titterdaily I really would love it if it would just stop asking me if I want to use a curse word. 🙄
@elonmusk @titterdaily Why don't you remove "toxicity scores" Who is allowed to define what is toxic and what is not ? Who gets to define what is "hateful" and what isn't ? This needs to end. Censorship is censorship no matter how much you sugar coat it.
@elonmusk @titterdaily I've always believed that one of the original objectives of Twitter was to become topical by allowing anybody, in any emotional state at that particular moment, to make a complete a$$ of themselves in front of a large audience. IMO the algo should scan tweets & ask "Really?".
@elonmusk @titterdaily I could care less if the algorithm doesn't like me. I'm just here for a good time.