@Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic If he wasn’t an average at best player, he’d deserve it over clay.
@TwitchyCoD @Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic He wasn’t average at best tho
@itz_fallsy @Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic When comparing him to all time great players he doesn’t belong in the conversation. Even if he was slightly above average during his short career, clay has been elite for a majority of his career.
@TwitchyCoD @Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic I don’t think greatest is all skill…no one puts Nade there because of what he accomplished in regard to accolades, even tho i think he was underrated in that regard. They place them there because of his impact on the pro scene.
@itz_fallsy @Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic Yeah I understand that. I just think anyone put in a Mount Rushmore has to be a great player. If we’re talking impact why is anyone choosing Nade over Hecz?
@TwitchyCoD @Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic I understand that…but I think Nade was a “great” player. He wasn’t as great, regarding ind skill, as some of the others, but I would put him around the top 30 cod pros in history. He’s won 7 chips, including the MW3 “champs”. Well, because Nade was a pro player and Hecz wasn’t.
@itz_fallsy @Prahfit6 @Automeltz @OpTic I agree with top 30, and he does have a ton of influence. But we’re comparing him to a guy who’s won 3x more champs, and almost 3x the event wins who also has had a big influence in shaping the cod scene. Far better player with a high influence > average player/higher influence
@Prahfit6 @itz_fallsy @Automeltz @OpTic If you’re comfortable putting an average at best player, who was routinely the worst player on his team above a guy who was always elite, won 3x the amount Nade did, and still was very influential in cod then be my guest. Just shows your bias.