Freddy 🤔 @ExJew33

@elil1 @tparsi stfu you lying piece of shit

@marklevinshow Lots of Epstein regime genocide supporters. Don't forget who they are.

@craigkellyAFEE GDP per capita is dropping with increased migration

@Erin_Molan get the fuck out of Australia whore

@LisaNEdwards no, every time I put money into the stock market I cause it to dump.. too late to be pulling from crypto too

@Fx1Jonny I remember that's what Jews claimed about Germany, kinda like Iraq.

@markpa84 It says the car was under the speed limit but FIA measures inaccurately due to curve in the track.

@markpa84 youtube.com/shorts/kTpQ890…

@markpa84 @PierreGASLY he didn't even exceed the speed limit

@callumvoisin @PierreGASLY except he didn't even go .1km/h over fool

Brilliant piece from Pearls and Irritations. Finally, someone in Australia is saying out loud what the rest of us have been watching for the past five years Let's be clear about what AUKUS actually is: the greatest military protection racket in modern history. Washington looked at its own crippled submarine industrial base—17 boats short, yards choking, Congress screaming—and found the perfect mark. A wealthy, eager, insecure middle power with a bipartisan fetish for great-power relevance and a defense minister who treats strategic questions like a classified state secret The deal? Australia pays half a trillion dollars. In return, it gets used Virginia-class hand-me-downs—Block IV boats with a decade of wear already on the hulls, probably smelling faintly of its previous crew Even more intriguing, the article confirms for what this overpriced second-hand Australian "sovereign" nuclear submarine fleet is actually for: Hunting Chinese Jin-class and Type 096 SSBNs. Not to protect Sydney Harbour. Not to secure Australia's trade routes. To find, track, and if ordered, destroy the Chinese nuclear submarines that threaten continental America! That's the job. That's the whole job. Australia just committed A$368 billion to be the US Navy's underwater security guard! The comedy of "sovereign capability" is almost too rich. Sovereign? The reactors are American. The combat system is American. The weapons are American. The fuel is American. The intelligence feed is American. The maintenance schedule is American. Permanently tethering Australia to U.S. software, maintenance, and logistics, effectively ending any "sovereign" capability. The only thing Australian is the taxpayer—and the Prime Minister standing in front of a camera calling this independence Australia is not buying a submarine; it is buying a node in a U.S. sensor network. The acquisition deeply integrates Australia into the U.S. military command structure, making Australia a tool for U.S. strategic objectives in the Indo-Pacific — while a massive amount of Australian wealth is transferred into the U.S. military-industrial complex And the timing is exquisite. Washington just added another half-trillion to its own defense budget while Australia is told to hit 3.5% of GDP. America gets the money, the boats, the basing rights at HMAS Stirling, and a Pacific ASW auxiliary. Australia gets the bill, the dependency, and the warm fuzzy feeling of being taken seriously by the adults. The U.S. 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) emphasizes "burden-sharing among allies" and "realist diplomacy." This submarine deal is the perfect execution of that strategy: the U.S. maintains its military overmatch against China by essentially "outsourcing" the financial cost of undersea surveillance to Australia 🤡 Paul Keating called this three years ago. He was mocked, of course. The press club gasped. The security establishment rolled its eyes. But he was right then, and this article proves he's right now. It is worse than he thought. It's not that AUKUS is of little military benefit to Australia. It's that AUKUS is of negative military benefit to Australia—actively diverting resources from actual defense needs toward a capability designed for someone else's homeland pearlsandirritations.com/post/2026/06/a…

@StarboySAR I read it was $800 billion yesterday, our government is absolute scum.

@DigitalRebel @Kate_L_Mosso @BitcoinCashOG quite the opposite and even if he was he didn't create BCH, he just chose a side after the fact

@Kate_L_Mosso @BitcoinCashOG BCH forked to continue Satoshi's scaling plan, BTC didn't because it was hijacked by pedos

"Para que los judíos se fueran a Israel, los sionistas se disfrazaron de musulmanes y atacaron a mujeres judías, hicieron atentados terroristas contra judíos en sinagogas de Irak, Egipcio, Marruecos... para aterrorizarlos y que se fueran a buscar refugio a Israel". Yakov Rabkin, profesor emérito de Historia en la Universidad de Montreal, denuncia el papel del sionismo contra los judíos para crear el apartheid de "Israel", como incluso los sionistas hicieron atentados terroristas contra los judíos (culpando a los musulmanes) para conseguir que se marcharan de sus paises. Durante el genocidio nazi, los sionistas igualmente llegaron a acuerdos con Hitler para fomentar la expulsión de judíos de Alemania, siempre y cuando esos judios fuesen expulsados hacia Palestina.

@A10Assets @craigkellyAFEE Young people cry about housing while throwing $10k at a holiday then borrow from mum and dad just to reach their 5% deposit.

@DaniMayakovski true except for the 'nazi genocide'

@hattotuwegama @NoticerNews It's currently at 1.6%, our population is set to double in 43 years

@coinbureau duh, retail knows the cycle, it's waiting time

@Valapraisio @VyprCEO