Aha so the way to put the AGI genie they themselves say could end humanity and upend society back in the bottle is to switch it off. Killswitch operator such an important job. This sophisticated thinking combined with amazing governance fills me with confidence, how about you?
Aha so the way to put the AGI genie they themselves say could end humanity and upend society back in the bottle is to switch it off. Killswitch operator such an important job. This sophisticated thinking combined with amazing governance fills me with confidence, how about you? https://t.co/vd4s0CKIUL
Full interview with other such delightful nuggets here: youtu.be/540vzMlf-54 Have heard they are actively lobbying against open source despite the fact it is essential to national security - open, auditable, interpretable system are essential for private and regulated data
Our global digital infrastructure runs on Linux, SQL etc versus buggy Windows for a reason. We are stronger together and in the open and this technology can uplift the whole of society, let's ensure everyone can benefit from it and collaborate to mitigate risks.
@EMostaque exactly. they will try to get government to patrol there moat for profit, but government should instead be patrolling them making sure they are not hurting consumers and are maintaining transparency.
@EMostaque Flip side of open sourcing AI is bad actors will copy the good parts and put the bad back in
@EMostaque SAM ALTMAN should get INTERVIEWED by KNOWLEDGEABLE COMPENT EXPERTS ... and NOT by a journalist (who just goes from one to the next written question)
@EMostaque Is there any logical project site that is open source currently, without links to big tech (Google, Apple, Meta) that can be optimized and funded quickly before "shit hits the fan" though?
@EMostaque It sounds very funny when it comes to the fact that AI was practically created. From whom will they hide the source code? From AI, which will see it anyway and, probably, without the help of people will be able to adapt it.
@EMostaque The larger and more secretive the company, the more regulated it should be. This makes fast takeoff less likely and will allow the benefits of the technology to be widely distributed and less concentrated.